Natural Resources Canada
Government of Canada

Geological Survey of Canada

Past lives: Chronicles of Canadian Paleontology
Eozoon canadense: the false dawn animal
Previous (Pethei stromatolites)Index (Introduction)Next (Gunflint Chert)

When he established Eozoon canadense, Sir William Dawson hailed this fossil as "one of the brightest gems in the scientific crown of the Geological Survey of Canada". Soon tarnished, this gem later turned to dross


Polished specimen of Eozoon canadense from the Cote St. Pierre locality north of Papineauville, Quebec. Green mineral is serpentine; white mineral is calcite. GSC specimen is 26 cm long. (Photo by BDEC (c))

Polished specimen of Eozoon canadense from the Cote St. Pierre locality north of Papineauville, Quebec. Green mineral is serpentine; white mineral is calcite. GSC specimen is 26 cm long.
(Photo by BDEC (c))

To many mid-Victorian geologists and paleontologists these laminated green and grey rock specimens from altered limestones of the Canadian Shield of Ontario and Quebec were the most important fossils ever found because they constituted evidence of the existence of complex life forms deep in the Precambrian. J. William Dawson, the Principal of McGill University and one of the foremost geologists in Canada, named the fossil Eozoon canadense -- the Canadian dawn animal. In his presidential address to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1864, Sir Charles Lyell singled out this fossil as "one of the greatest geological discoveries of his time". Charles Darwin, in the fourth edition of Origin of Species in 1866, was relieved to be able to cite the first fossil evidence that the succession of life on earth proceeded from simple unicellular organisms to complex multicellular animals and plants.

Dawson concluded that Eozoon was the shell of a foraminiferan, a single-celled protistan complete with chambers and canal systems, but one hundreds of times larger than any of the living forms which are all microscopic. This view was almost immediately challenged by a pair of Irish geologists who claimed that Eozoon was not organic, but a metamorphic feature formed from the segregation of minerals in marble through the influence of great heat and pressure. For the next ten years, increasingly acrimonious debates on the nature of Eozoon appeared in British and American journals. An exhaustive analysis by a German professor of zoology, Karl Möbius in 1879 demonstrated that Eozoon displayed not a single characteristic trait of foraminiferans. This settled the matter for virtually all geologists and paleontologists, but not Dawson.


A drawer of thin sections and polished specimens of Eozoon prepared for Sir William Logan by GSC geologist H.G. Vennor in 1867 (Photo by BDEC (c))

A drawer of thin sections and polished specimens of Eozoon prepared for Sir William Logan by GSC geologist H.G. Vennor in 1867
(Photo by BDEC (c))

Compelling evidence came from an unlikely source in 1894 when two geologists reported Eozoon in limestone blocks ejected from the volcano Mount Vesuvius. Precambrian fossils shot out of an Italian volcano was something few paleontologists were prepared to accept. Undeterred, but virtually alone in the geological community, Sir William continued to defend the organic nature of Eozoon. When he died in 1899 he was working on yet another Eozoon paper.


J. William Dawson, the Principal of McGill University and chief Eozoon promoter.

J. William Dawson, the Principal of McGill University and chief Eozoon promoter.

Further reading:

Hofmann, H.J.
1971:  Precambrian fossils, pseudofossils, and problematica in Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 189.

O'Brien, C.F.
1970:  Eozoon canadense "The dawn animal of Canada". Isis, vol. 61, p. 206-223.


Previous (Pethei stromatolites)Index (Introduction)Next (Gunflint Chert)
http://cgc.rncan.gc.ca/paleochron/04_e.php